Table of Contents
- Module 1 — Google Cloud’s GenAI Advantage
- Module 2 — Prebuilt GenAI Offerings for AI-powered Work
- Module 3 — Improving Customer Experience with GenAI
- Module 4 — Building with AI and Agents on Google Cloud
- Module 5 — Exam Preparation
- Python Code Examples — Vertex AI SDK
- Gemini Model Comparison
- Google Cloud AI vs AWS AI vs Azure AI
- Google Cloud GenAI Pricing
- Architecture Diagrams
- Key Concepts and Terminology
Module 1 — Google Cloud’s GenAI Advantage
Why Google Cloud for GenAI?
Google’s AI evolution spans more than 25 years. Here are the foundational milestones:
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 2001 | Google transforms its search engine into a machine learning environment (“Did you mean” feature) |
| 2014 | Acquisition of DeepMind — first breakthrough: AI that learns to play Atari games from raw pixels |
| 2015 | Open source release of TensorFlow — worldwide democratization of AI |
| 2016 | Sundar Pichai announces the “AI first” strategy (replacing “mobile first”) |
| 2017 | Publication of “Attention Is All You Need” — introduction of the Transformer architecture |
| 2021 | Launch of LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications) |
| 2023 | Launch of Bard, then Duet AI for Workspace |
| 2024 | Gemini 1.0 then Gemini 1.5 with a 1M token context window |
| 2025 | Gemini 2.0 — Flash, Pro, Ultra with native agentic capabilities |
The significance of TensorFlow:
- Democratized AI at a global scale
- Created an ecosystem around Tensor Processing Units (TPUs)
- TPUs are the gold standard for training and inference of foundation models
The Transformer Architecture: The “Attention Is All You Need” paper introduced the attention mechanism, allowing models to understand relationships between tokens regardless of their distance. This is the foundation of all modern LLMs (GPT, Gemini, Claude, LLaMA).
$$\text{Attention}(Q,K,V) = \text{softmax}\left(\frac{QK^T}{\sqrt{d_k}}\right)V$$
Enterprise-ready AI at Scale
For AI to be enterprise-ready, it must meet several critical requirements:
The Four Pillars of Enterprise-Readiness
graph TD
ERA["Enterprise-Ready AI"]
ERA --> RA["Responsible AI\nEthical principles\nTransparency\nAccountability"]
ERA --> EG["Enterprise Governance\nAccess policies\nCompliance guardrails\nAudit trails"]
ERA --> DP["Data Privacy\nData isolation\nOrganizational control\nNo public training exposure"]
ERA --> SEC["Security\nEncryption in transit and at rest\nGranular IAM\nContinuous monitoring"]
Reliability at Scale — Evidence by Example
| Google Service | Proof of Reliability |
|---|---|
| Gmail | Continuous availability for 3+ billion users |
| Google Search | Processing 8.5+ billion queries/day with consistent performance |
| YouTube | 500+ hours of video uploaded per minute — global streaming |
| Google Maps | Billions of real-time navigation queries |
The same infrastructure that powers Gmail and Google Search underpins Google Cloud AI for enterprises — a guarantee of SLA, scalability, and resilience.
A Unified and Open AI Ecosystem
Google’s strategy is “AI everywhere”: Gemini serves as the reasoning engine integrated throughout the entire Google stack.
Gemini in Google Workspace
graph TD
Gemini["Gemini\n(Foundation Model)"]
Gemini --> Gmail["Gmail\nComposing, summarizing,\nprioritization"]
Gemini --> Drive["Google Drive\nIntelligent search\nFile summarization"]
Gemini --> Docs["Google Docs\nContent generation\nClarity improvement"]
Gemini --> Sheets["Google Sheets\nTrend interpretation\nFormula recommendations"]
Gemini --> Slides["Google Slides\nContent structuring\nPresenter notes"]
Gemini --> Calendar["Google Calendar\nAssisted scheduling"]
Gemini --> Meet["Google Meet\nAutomatic summaries\nDecision capture"]
Gemini Integrated into Google Cloud Services
| Google Cloud Service | Integrated Gemini Capability |
|---|---|
| BigQuery | Natural language data exploration, SQL query generation, insight summarization |
| Looker | Report creation, trend explanation, narrative insights |
| Security Operations (SecOps) | Threat summarization, incident investigation, AI prioritization |
| Firebase | Code generation, debugging, intelligent application experiences |
| Cloud Spanner / AlloyDB | Natural language queries, schema optimization |
| Colab Enterprise | Code generation, debugging, notebook explanation |
Vertex AI Model Garden — Open Ecosystem
Model Garden is Google Cloud’s centralized AI model catalog:
mindmap
root((Model Garden))
Google Models
Gemini Pro / Flash / Ultra
Imagen 3
Codey
Chirp 2 (Speech)
MedPaLM 2
Open Source
Llama 3 / 3.1 / 3.2
Mistral / Mixtral
Falcon
Gemma 2 / 3
Phi-3
Third Party
Anthropic Claude
AI21 Labs Jamba
Cohere Command
The ecosystem is intentionally open — Google Cloud is not limited to internally developed models. This is a major differentiator versus a closed ecosystem.
Infrastructure Optimized for GenAI
graph TB
subgraph "Google Cloud GenAI Infrastructure Stack"
L4["AI Platforms & Models\nVertex AI · Gemini · Foundation Models\nAgent Builder · AutoML"]
L3["Hypercomputer Orchestration\nDistributed Training · Large-scale Inference\nSeamless Scaling · No manual management"]
L2["Custom TPU & GPU Accelerators\nGoogle TPUs v4/v5 · High-performance GPUs A100/H100\nSuperior cost-efficiency vs generic solutions"]
L1["Global Data Centers\nHigh availability · Low latency\nEnergy efficiency · 35+ regions worldwide"]
end
L4 --> L3
L3 --> L2
L2 --> L1
TPUs vs GPUs — When to Use Which?
| Criterion | TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) | GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Custom Google hardware for ML | General purpose + ML |
| Optimal for | Training large models, batch inference | Varied ML workloads, fine-tuning |
| Parallelism | Massive matrix multiplication | General CUDA cores |
| Cost efficiency | Superior for large-scale LLMs | Flexible, more universal |
| Availability | Google Cloud exclusively | Multi-cloud |
| Current generation | TPU v4, v5e, v5p | A100, H100 available |
Module 2 — Prebuilt GenAI Offerings for AI-powered Work
From Models to Everyday Work with Gemini
The transformation of Gemini into business value follows a logical 4-step progression:
graph LR
A["Model\n(Foundation)"] --> B["Integration\n(Into Workspace\nand Cloud tools)"]
B --> C["Interface\n(User UI/UX\nDocs, Gmail, BigQuery...)"]
C --> D["Data\n(Organization data\nInternal knowledge base)"]
style A fill:#4285f4,color:#fff
style B fill:#34a853,color:#fff
style C fill:#fbbc04,color:#000
style D fill:#ea4335,color:#fff
Analogy: Gemini is like an engine — powerful on its own, but it only creates real value when integrated into a complete vehicle (with its interface and fuel — the data).
Real Multimodal Use Cases
| Scenario | Input Types | GenAI Output |
|---|---|---|
| Executive briefing | Meeting transcripts + slides + spreadsheets | Executive brief with risks and recommendations |
| Customer support | Customer history + knowledge base + audio | Contextual real-time resolution |
| Product analysis | Defect images + technical reports + historical data | Anomaly report with corrective recommendations |
| Recruiting | Resumes + job descriptions + recorded interviews | Candidate ranking and comparative insights |
| Financial analysis | Annual reports + market data + news | Risk and opportunity synthesis |
Gemini App and Gemini Advanced
Gemini App — Three Adaptive Roles
graph TD
User["User"]
User -->|"Inbox management\nand priorities"| RA["Research Assistant\nCondenses email threads\nSurfaces key actions\nPrioritizes attention"]
User -->|"Content creation\nand analysis"| WP["Writing Partner\nStructures ideas\nRefines tone\nClarifies message\nAdapts to audience"]
User -->|"Presentation\npreparation"| RC["Reasoning Collaborator\nOrganizes thoughts\nIdentifies logic gaps\nImproves arguments\nStrengthens conclusions"]
Gemini Gems — Customization by Use Case
Gems are customizable versions of Gemini designed for specific tasks, roles, or workflows.
Key characteristics:
- Created once with clear instructions → consistent behavior on each use
- Two types: Google premade Gems + user-created custom Gems
Example HR Gem:
Name: Technical Recruiter
Instructions: You are a specialized technical recruiter.
For each submitted resume, systematically identify
and list cloud and coding certifications present.
Format output as: NAME / CERTIFICATION / LEVEL
Assign a score from 1 to 10 based on alignment
with the Senior Cloud Architect position.
Other useful enterprise Gems:
| Gem | Role | Example Instructions |
|---|---|---|
| Code Reviewer | Code review | Analyze code, identify OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, suggest performance improvements |
| Legal Summarizer | Legal summary | Condense contracts to key points, identify risky clauses |
| Data Analyst | Data analysis | Interpret tables, propose visualizations, explain trends |
| Customer Email | Customer communication | Draft professional responses adapted to escalation level |
Gemini Access Level Comparison
| Feature | Gemini App (free) | Gemini Advanced | Gemini Business | Gemini Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic chat | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multimodal (image, audio) | ✅ limited | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom Gems | Limited | ✅ Full | ✅ | ✅ |
| Workspace integration | ❌ | Partial | ✅ | ✅ |
| Model used | Gemini Flash | Gemini Pro/Ultra | Gemini Pro | Gemini Ultra |
| Enterprise governance | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Data isolation | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| NotebookLM Enterprise | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Configurable agents | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Enterprise Capabilities of Gemini
Security and Data Control
Data isolation — Everything teams submit remains isolated from public model training:
- Proprietary source code
- Customer data and medical records
- Legal documents and contracts
- Internal financial projections
- Product plans and roadmaps
Integrated Google Cloud security architecture:
graph LR
subgraph "Gemini Enterprise Security"
IAM["IAM\nIdentity and Access\nManagement"]
DLP["DLP\nData Loss\nPrevention"]
ENC["Encryption\nAt rest and in transit\nCMEK supported"]
AUDIT["Audit Logging\nWho · What · When\nCompliance trails"]
CERTIF["Certifications\nSOC 2 · ISO 27001\nHIPAA · PCI DSS"]
end
NotebookLM — AI Workspace Anchored in Your Sources
NotebookLM is an AI workspace designed for thinking, researching, and synthesizing information based on curated sources.
Fundamental difference from a generic chatbot:
| Generic Chatbot | NotebookLM |
|---|---|
| General internet knowledge | Anchored in YOUR documents only |
| Potentially off-context responses | Responses traceable to exact sources |
| Possible hallucinations on internal data | Grounded in approved materials |
| No editorial control | Sources controlled by the user |
| No citation | Inline citations with reference to the source document |
Supported source types:
- PDFs, Google Docs, Google Slides
- Websites (URLs)
- Copied text and transcriptions
- Audio files (up to 8 hours)
- YouTube videos
NotebookLM Interface:
- Sources panel (left): source management and addition — max 50 sources / 25M tokens per notebook
- Work area (center): interaction, anchored Q&A
- Studio panel (right): synthesis generation, Audio Overview (podcast), case studies
Gemini for Google Workspace
Capabilities by Application
graph TD
subgraph Gmail["Gmail"]
G1["Composing contextual replies"]
G2["Summarizing long email threads"]
G3["Surfacing next steps"]
G4["Adapting tone by recipient"]
end
subgraph Docs["Google Docs"]
D1["Generating initial drafts"]
D2["Improving clarity and style"]
D3["Adapting content by audience"]
D4["Reformatting and restructuring"]
end
subgraph Sheets["Google Sheets"]
S1["Interpreting trends"]
S2["Recommending formulas"]
S3["Summarizing numerical data"]
S4["Projection and predictive analysis"]
end
subgraph Slides["Google Slides"]
SL1["Structuring slide content"]
SL2["Refining key messages"]
SL3["Creating presenter notes"]
SL4["Transforming docs into decks"]
end
subgraph Meet["Google Meet"]
M1["Automatic meeting summaries"]
M2["Capturing key decisions"]
M3["Generating action items"]
M4["Catch-up for absentees"]
end
End-to-end Workflow Example
Scenario: Leadership team meeting
1. DURING THE MEETING (Meet)
└── Gemini automatically captures the discussion, transcribes and analyzes
2. AFTER THE MEETING (automatic — within seconds)
└── Summary generated with decisions, actions, and owners
3. DRAFTING THE MEETING NOTES (Docs)
└── Gemini structures the document from the Meet summary + past context
4. SENDING TO STAKEHOLDERS (Gmail)
└── Gemini adapts tone and detail level by recipient
(detailed version for team / executive version for the board)
5. TRACKING ACTIONS (Sheets)
└── Automatic dashboard with statuses, owners, and deadlines
Module 3 — Improving Customer Experience with GenAI
How GenAI Transforms Customer Experience
The Three Pillars of Modern CX
graph TD
CX["Modern Customer\nExperience"]
CX --> Search["Search\nImmediate answers\nIn business context"]
CX --> Conv["Conversation\nNatural interactions\nHuman-like without friction"]
CX --> Pers["Personalization\nExperiences adapted\nto history and preferences"]
Before vs After GenAI in the Contact Center
| Dimension | Before GenAI | With GenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution time | 8–15 minutes (manual search) | 1–3 minutes (automatic suggestions) |
| Customer satisfaction | Frustration from waiting | First-contact resolution |
| Agent workload | Manual document lookup | Focus on empathy and added value |
| Consistency | Varies by agent | Standardized on approved knowledge base |
| Analytics | Manual sampling (5–10% of calls) | 100% of interactions analyzed |
| Multilingualism | Dedicated agents per language | Integrated real-time translation |
GenAI Flow in the Contact Center
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Customer
participant VA as Virtual Agent
participant AA as Agent Assist
participant H as Human Agent
participant CI as Insights
C->>VA: Asks a question (chat/voice)
VA->>VA: Understands intent (NLU)
VA->>C: Autonomous resolution (simple cases 70%)
C->>H: Transfer for complex cases
AA->>H: Real-time suggestions + relevant docs
H->>C: AI-assisted response
H->>CI: Automatic interaction log
CI->>CI: Analyzes trends and sentiment
AI-powered Search Experiences
Evolution of Search
graph LR
A["Traditional Search\n- Keyword matching\n- Results: list of links\n- Effort on user side\n- Intent not understood"] -->|"AI Revolution"| B["AI-powered Search\n- Natural language understanding\n- Direct synthesized answer\n- Anchored in enterprise content\n- Intent understood = Discovery"]
Vertex AI Search — Multimodal Capabilities
| Input Type | Enterprise Use Example | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Natural language text | ”What is our reimbursement policy for international orders?” | Direct answer citing the policy |
| Speech and audio | Search through 10,000h of call transcriptions | Recurring complaints, sentiment trends |
| Images | Upload a product defect photo | Defect identification + corrective procedure |
| Video | Analysis of training recordings | Key point extraction, timestamps |
| Structured documents | Analysis of invoices, contracts, HR forms | Entity extraction, automatic classification |
Dialogflow CX and Agent Assist
Contact Center AI (CCAI) Architecture
graph TD
Customer["Customer"] --> |"Phone call\nChat / Email"| ENTRY["Entry point\nCCAI Platform"]
subgraph CCAI["Contact Center AI — Google Cloud"]
VA["Virtual Agent\n(Dialogflow CX)\n- Autonomous resolution\n- Multi-turn conversations\n- CRM integration\n- Intelligent escalation"]
AA["Agent Assist\n- Real-time suggestions\n- Document snippets\n- Smart reply\n- Automatic summary"]
CI["Conversational Insights\n- 100% interaction analysis\n- Sentiment detection\n- Recurring topics\n- Operational KPIs"]
end
ENTRY --> VA
VA -->|"Complex cases"| Human["Human Agent"]
AA --> Human
Human --> CI
VA --> CI
subgraph "Backend Integrations"
CRM["CRM\n(Salesforce, SAP)"]
KB["Knowledge\nBase"]
DB["Databases"]
end
VA & AA --> CRM & KB & DB
Dialogflow CX vs Dialogflow ES
| Criterion | Dialogflow ES (Essentials) | Dialogflow CX (Customer Experience) |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | Simple conversations | Complex multi-turn conversations |
| Context management | Linear | Visual flowchart (pages/flows) |
| Versioning/environments | Limited | Full versioning + A/B testing |
| Use case | Simple chatbots, FAQ | Enterprise contact centers, complex journeys |
| Integrations | Standard | Advanced webhooks, persistent state |
| Analytics | Basic | Advanced with Conversational Insights |
Agent Assist — Real-time Assistance
| Feature | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Reply | Context-based response suggestions | -40% drafting time |
| Knowledge Assist | KB snippets surfaced automatically | Resolution without hold time |
| Call Summary | Auto-generated summary after the call | -60% post-call work time |
| Article Suggestion | Relevant articles based on current conversation | Consistent responses |
| CSAT Prediction | Real-time satisfaction prediction | Proactive intervention |
Module 4 — Building with AI and Agents on Google Cloud
Developer Choice, Control, and Accessibility
Data Protections — Always-on vs Configurable
graph TD
subgraph "Always-On Protections"
P1["Proprietary data isolation\n(excluded from public model training)"]
P2["Encryption in transit (TLS 1.3)"]
P3["Encryption at rest (AES-256)"]
P4["Interception protection"]
end
subgraph "Configurable Protections"
C1["Data Sovereignty Controls\n(storage and processing location)"]
C2["IAM Policies\n(granular roles and permissions)"]
C3["VPC Service Controls\n(security perimeters)"]
C4["CMEK — Customer-Managed Encryption Keys"]
C5["Audit Logging\n(complete traceability)"]
end
Audit Logging — Governance and Compliance
Audit logging systematically records:
- Who accessed the data (user / service account)
- What requests were submitted (prompt content)
- How outputs were generated (model, version, context)
- When each interaction took place (precise timestamp)
Vertex AI Platform Essentials
Vertex AI sits in the platform layer of the AI stack. It provides a managed environment to traverse the entire machine learning lifecycle.
The ML Lifecycle in Vertex AI
graph LR
subgraph "Prepare Data"
PD1["Dataset management\nLabeling · Versioning"]
PD2["Feature Store\nReusable features"]
end
subgraph "Model Development"
MD1["Model Garden\nModel selection"]
MD2["Training / AutoML\nCustom training"]
MD3["Evaluation\nMetrics and benchmarks"]
MD4["Vertex AI Studio\nPrompt experimentation"]
end
subgraph "Deploy and Use"
DU1["Deployment\nManaged endpoints"]
DU2["Monitoring\nModel drift · Performance"]
DU3["Lifecycle Management\nVersions · Rollback"]
end
PD1 & PD2 --> MD1
MD1 --> MD2
MD2 --> MD3
MD3 --> MD4
MD4 --> DU1
DU1 --> DU2
DU2 --> DU3
Model Garden — Centralized Catalog
Model categories in Model Garden:
| Category | Key Models | Use Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Text Generation | Gemini Pro/Flash/Ultra | Chat, summarization, Q&A, reasoning |
| Code | Gemini Code, Codey | Code generation, review, debugging |
| Image | Imagen 3 | Text-to-image, editing, variation |
| Speech | Chirp 2 | Speech-to-text, transcription |
| Embedding | text-embedding-004 | Semantic vectorization, RAG |
| Vision | Gemini Vision | Image and video analysis |
| Medical | MedPaLM 2 | Medical Q&A, clinical summarization |
| Open-source | Llama 3.1, Gemma 2, Mistral | Custom fine-tuning |
AutoML — Training Without Deep ML Expertise
What AutoML completely abstracts:
- Automatic feature engineering
- Model architecture selection
- Hyperparameter tuning (Neural Architecture Search)
- Compute infrastructure (auto-scaling)
- Evaluation and selection of the best model
AutoML supported problem types:
| Type | Input | Output | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tabular classification | CSV table | Classes | Predict customer churn |
| Tabular regression | CSV table | Numeric value | Predict inventory needs |
| Image classification | Labeled images | Classes | Product defect detection |
| Object detection | Annotated images | Bounding boxes | Visual inventory |
| Text classification | Labeled text | Classes | Ticket categorization |
| Video classification | Labeled videos | Classes | Behavior analysis |
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) on Google Cloud
The Gap Between Public Models and Enterprise Needs
graph TD
subgraph "Public Foundation Models"
PUB1["Strong general knowledge"]
PUB2["Good for common low-risk tasks"]
PUB3["No access to internal data"]
PUB4["Hallucinations on specific data"]
PUB5["Potentially outdated training data"]
PUB6["Not aligned with organizational governance"]
end
RAG["RAG\n(Retrieval-Augmented Generation)\nBridges the enterprise gap"]
subgraph "Enterprise Needs Addressed by RAG"
ENT1["Responses aligned with verified information"]
ENT2["High accuracy for critical decisions"]
ENT3["Secure access to internal knowledge bases"]
ENT4["Traceable, evidence-based responses"]
ENT5["Up-to-date policies and products"]
ENT6["Compliance with access rules"]
end
PUB1 -.->|"Augmented by"| RAG
RAG -.->|"Produces"| ENT1
Complete RAG Pipeline — Step by Step
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant R as Retriever
participant VDB as Vector Database
participant EMBED as Embedding Model
participant LLM as Gemini LLM
participant KB as Knowledge Base
Note over KB,EMBED: Ingestion phase (offline)
KB->>EMBED: Document chunks
EMBED->>VDB: Vectors (embeddings)
Note over U,LLM: Query phase (real-time)
U->>R: Submits a question
R->>EMBED: Vectorizes the question
EMBED->>VDB: Semantic search (cosine similarity)
VDB-->>R: Top-K relevant chunks
R->>LLM: Question + augmented context
LLM-->>U: Response anchored in internal sources
Detailed RAG pipeline steps:
| Step | Action | Google Cloud Technology |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Ingestion | Internal documents split into chunks | Cloud Storage + Document AI |
| 2. Vectorization | Each chunk converted to an embedding | text-embedding-004 |
| 3. Storage | Vectors stored in a vector database | Vertex AI Vector Search |
| 4. Query | User asks a question | Vertex AI Studio / API |
| 5. Search | Nearest chunks retrieved | Cosine similarity search |
| 6. Augmentation | Question + chunks = final prompt | Prompt Management |
| 7. Generation | LLM generates an anchored response | Gemini Pro / Flash |
Building Agents with Tools and Studios
Cloud Services at the Foundation of Agents
graph TD
Agent["AI Agent\n(Vertex AI Agent Builder)"]
subgraph "Data Services"
CS["Cloud Storage\nDocuments and policies"]
DB["Cloud SQL / Spanner\nCustomer history · Transactions"]
FS["Firestore\nReal-time data"]
end
subgraph "Compute Services"
CR["Cloud Run\nContainer-based runtime\nBusiness logic"]
CF["Cloud Functions\nEvent-driven\nPoint-in-time actions"]
end
subgraph "Language Services"
TTS["Text-to-Speech\nNatural audio responses"]
STT["Speech-to-Text (Chirp)\nReal-time transcription"]
TR["Cloud Translation\n130+ language support"]
end
subgraph "Media Intelligence"
VA["Vision AI\nImage interpretation"]
DP["Document AI\nInvoice/contract extraction"]
VID["Video Intelligence\nVideo analysis"]
end
Agent --> CS & DB & FS
Agent --> CR & CF
Agent --> TTS & STT & TR
Agent --> VA & DP & VID
Vertex AI Agent Builder — Key Components
| Component | Function | Code Level |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Builder Console | No-code interface for building agents | No-code |
| Grounding | Anchor responses to specific sources | Configuration |
| Tool use (Function Calling) | Connect agents to external APIs | Low-code |
| Extensions | Integration with Google services (Gmail, Calendar) | No-code |
| Multi-agent orchestration | Coordination of multiple specialized agents | Low-code |
| Evaluation | Test and measure response quality | Configuration |
Complete example of a customer support agent:
E-COMMERCE CUSTOMER SUPPORT AGENT FLOW
1. Customer: "I haven't received my order #54321"
NLU result: Intent = track_order, Entity = order_id:54321
2. Function Call → Cloud SQL
SELECT status, estimated_delivery FROM orders WHERE id='54321'
Result: "In transit, estimated delivery tomorrow"
3. Function Call → Knowledge Base (RAG)
Retrieves the late delivery policy
Includes tracking number and carrier
4. Gemini generates the contextualized response:
"Your order #54321 is currently in transit with
UPS (tracking: 1Z999...). Delivery is expected
tomorrow before 6 PM. If you don't receive it,
contact us and we'll open a dispute immediately."
5. Customer satisfaction: question resolved in 3 seconds
Automatic log in Conversational Insights
Module 5 — Exam Preparation
Approach Strategy for the Google Cloud Generative AI Leader Exam
Recommended elimination methodology:
- Identify clearly wrong answers first (quick elimination)
- Look for the keyword that reveals the intent in the question
- Compare remaining answers against the use case context
- Choose the most efficient solution — Google Cloud rewards efficiency and managed services
Question 1 — Google Cloud’s GenAI Advantage
Question: A developer team wants to build a specialized application. They prefer Vertex AI but need to use a specific open-source model alongside Gemini. Which feature satisfies this requirement?
| Option | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| B. “Locked Ecosystem” policy | Incorrect | Google Cloud is intentionally open, not closed |
| C. Manual porting to TPUs | Incorrect | Vertex AI abstracts infrastructure management |
| D. Text models only | Incorrect | Vertex AI supports text, image, audio, video, code |
| A. Vertex AI Model Garden | Correct | Single catalog for Google, open-source, and third-party models |
Question 2 — Prebuilt GenAI for AI-powered Work
Question: An HR manager wants to create a reusable version of Gemini pre-programmed to always act as a “technical recruiter” with persistent instructions. Which feature is most appropriate?
| Option | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| C. NotebookLM | Incorrect | For source document analysis — not reusable personas |
| A. Gemini Advanced Search | Incorrect | Improves retrieval — doesn’t create persistent behaviors |
| D. Gemini Extensions | Incorrect | Connects to external tools — doesn’t define a constant role/tone |
| B. Gems | Correct | Customized versions with persistent, reusable instructions |
Question 3 — Improving Customer Experience with GenAI
Question: During a critical call, a representative struggles to find a warranty clause. Which GenAI capability would provide real-time suggested responses and document snippets during the call?
| Option | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| D. Vertex AI Pipelines | Incorrect | Orchestrates ML workflows — not live assistance |
| B. Vertex AI Model Garden | Incorrect | Model selection — not real-time assistance |
| A. Conversational Insights | Incorrect | Post-interaction — analyzes after the call, not during |
| C. Agent Assist | Correct | Real-time suggestions + snippets during the active call |
Key distinction: Conversational Insights = post-interaction. Agent Assist = real-time during the interaction.
Question 4 — Building with AI and Agents on Google Cloud
Question: A retail team has excellent data but lacks ML expertise. They want to predict inventory needs based on weather patterns. Which Vertex AI capability should they use?
| Option | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| A. Managed Pipelines | Incorrect | Assumes a team capable of writing training code |
| C. Vertex AI Studio | Incorrect | For foundation models and prompts — not tabular prediction models |
| D. Model Garden + local fine-tuning | Incorrect | Local fine-tuning requires significant ML expertise |
| B. AutoML | Correct | Automatically trains and optimizes — “no-code” approach |
Revealing keyword: “lacks deep machine learning coding expertise” → no-code solution = AutoML.
Python Code Examples — Vertex AI SDK
Installation and Setup
# pip install google-cloud-aiplatform
import vertexai
from vertexai.generative_models import GenerativeModel, Part, GenerationConfig
# Initialize the project and region
PROJECT_ID = "my-gcp-project"
LOCATION = "us-central1" # or europe-west1, us-east1, etc.
vertexai.init(project=PROJECT_ID, location=LOCATION)
Gemini — Text Generation
from vertexai.generative_models import GenerativeModel, GenerationConfig
# Initialize the model
model = GenerativeModel("gemini-2.0-flash-001")
# Generation configuration
gen_config = GenerationConfig(
temperature=0.3, # 0.0 = deterministic, 1.0 = creative
top_p=0.90, # Nucleus sampling
top_k=35, # Top-K sampling
max_output_tokens=1024, # Max response length
)
# Simple generation
response = model.generate_content(
"List five advantages of using Vertex AI in an enterprise setting.",
generation_config=gen_config
)
print(response.text)
# With system instructions
model_with_system = GenerativeModel(
"gemini-2.0-flash-001",
system_instruction=[
"You are a cloud computing expert specializing in Google Cloud.",
"Always respond in English.",
"Be precise and concise. Maximum 3 sentences per point."
]
)
response = model_with_system.generate_content(
"What are the differences between Vertex AI and AI Studio?"
)
print(response.text)
# Structured JSON generation
import json
response_json = model.generate_content(
"""Analyze this text and return structured JSON:
"Customer Alice Johnson ordered 4 items on March 5, 2025.
The order is in transit. Expected delivery on March 9."
Expected JSON format:
{
"customer": string,
"item_count": number,
"order_date": string,
"status": string,
"estimated_delivery": string
}""",
generation_config=GenerationConfig(
response_mime_type="application/json"
)
)
data = json.loads(response_json.text)
print(f"Customer: {data['customer']}")
print(f"Status: {data['status']}")
Gemini — Multimodal (image + text)
from vertexai.generative_models import GenerativeModel, Part
# Multimodal model
model = GenerativeModel("gemini-2.0-pro-001")
# Analyze an image from a GCS bucket
image_part = Part.from_uri(
uri="gs://my-bucket/images/product-defect.jpg",
mime_type="image/jpeg"
)
response = model.generate_content([
image_part,
"Identify the type of defect visible in this product image. "
"Classify it from these categories: [scratch, crack, deformation, contamination]. "
"Rate the severity from 1 to 5. Suggest a corrective action."
])
print(response.text)
# Analyze multiple images in a single request
response_multi = model.generate_content([
"Compare these two product images and identify the differences:",
Part.from_uri("gs://bucket/imageA.jpg", mime_type="image/jpeg"),
Part.from_uri("gs://bucket/imageB.jpg", mime_type="image/jpeg"),
])
print(response_multi.text)
# Analyze a video
video_part = Part.from_uri(
uri="gs://my-bucket/videos/onboarding.mp4",
mime_type="video/mp4"
)
response_video = model.generate_content([
video_part,
"Summarize the key takeaways from this onboarding video in 5 bullet points."
])
print(response_video.text)
Embeddings and RAG
from vertexai.language_models import TextEmbeddingModel
import numpy as np
# Generate embeddings
embed_model = TextEmbeddingModel.from_pretrained("text-embedding-004")
# Batch embeddings (efficient for ingestion)
documents = [
"Gemini is Google's multimodal foundation model.",
"RAG anchors LLM responses in verified sources.",
"AutoML simplifies custom model training.",
]
batch_embeddings = embed_model.get_embeddings(documents)
vectors = [e.values for e in batch_embeddings]
# Cosine similarity calculation
def cosine_similarity(v1, v2):
v1, v2 = np.array(v1), np.array(v2)
return np.dot(v1, v2) / (np.linalg.norm(v1) * np.linalg.norm(v2))
query_embedding = embed_model.get_embeddings(["How does RAG work?"])[0].values
scores = [cosine_similarity(query_embedding, v) for v in vectors]
best_match = np.argmax(scores)
print(f"Most relevant chunk: {documents[best_match]}")
print(f"Similarity score: {scores[best_match]:.4f}")
# Complete RAG pipeline
from vertexai.generative_models import GenerativeModel
def rag_query(user_question: str, knowledge_base: list[dict], top_k: int = 3) -> str:
"""
Simplified RAG pipeline:
1. Vectorize the question
2. Search for relevant chunks (cosine similarity)
3. Augment the prompt
4. Generate the anchored response
"""
# Step 1: Vectorize the question
query_vector = embed_model.get_embeddings([user_question])[0].values
# Step 2: Semantic search
ranked = []
for item in knowledge_base:
score = cosine_similarity(query_vector, item["vector"])
ranked.append((score, item["text"]))
ranked.sort(reverse=True)
top_chunks = [text for _, text in ranked[:top_k]]
# Steps 3 + 4: Augment and generate
context_str = "\n\n".join([f"[Source {i+1}] {chunk}" for i, chunk in enumerate(top_chunks)])
model = GenerativeModel("gemini-2.0-flash-001")
augmented_prompt = f"""You are an enterprise assistant. Answer ONLY based on the
provided sources. If the answer is not in the sources, state that clearly.
SOURCES:
{context_str}
QUESTION: {user_question}
ANSWER (with source citations):"""
return model.generate_content(augmented_prompt).text
# Usage
kb = [
{"text": "The standard return policy is valid for 30 days after receipt.", "vector": vectors[0]},
{"text": "International orders qualify for a 45-day return window.", "vector": vectors[1]},
]
for item in kb:
item["vector"] = embed_model.get_embeddings([item["text"]])[0].values
answer = rag_query(
"How many days do I have to return an international order?",
kb
)
print(answer)
Vertex AI Search (code) {#vertex-ai-search-code}
from google.cloud import discoveryengine_v1 as discoveryengine
def search_enterprise_docs(query: str, project_id: str, data_store_id: str) -> dict:
"""
Vertex AI Search — Search through an enterprise document corpus
with synthesized responses and citations.
"""
client = discoveryengine.SearchServiceClient()
serving_config = client.serving_config_path(
project=project_id,
location="global",
data_store=data_store_id,
serving_config="default_config",
)
request = discoveryengine.SearchRequest(
serving_config=serving_config,
query=query,
page_size=5,
content_search_spec=discoveryengine.SearchRequest.ContentSearchSpec(
summary_spec=discoveryengine.SearchRequest.ContentSearchSpec.SummarySpec(
summary_result_count=5,
include_citations=True,
language_code="en",
),
extractive_content_spec=discoveryengine.SearchRequest.ContentSearchSpec.ExtractiveContentSpec(
max_extractive_answer_count=3,
),
),
)
response = client.search(request)
results = []
for result in response.results:
doc = result.document
results.append({
"id": doc.id,
"title": doc.derived_struct_data.get("title", ""),
"snippet": doc.derived_struct_data.get("snippets", [{}])[0].get("snippet", ""),
})
return {
"synthesized_answer": response.summary.summary_text,
"sources": results
}
# Usage
result = search_enterprise_docs(
query="What is our PTO policy for part-time employees?",
project_id="my-gcp-project",
data_store_id="my-hr-document-store"
)
print(f"Synthesized answer: {result['synthesized_answer']}")
print(f"Number of sources: {len(result['sources'])}")
Vertex AI Agent Builder (code) {#vertex-ai-agent-builder-code}
from google.cloud import dialogflowcx_v3 as dialogflow
PROJECT_ID = "my-gcp-project"
LOCATION = "us-central1"
AGENT_ID = "my-agent-id"
def create_agent_session_handler(agent_id: str):
"""
Creates a handler to interact with a Dialogflow CX agent.
Returns a detect_intent function for multi-turn conversations.
"""
session_client = dialogflow.SessionsClient(
client_options={"api_endpoint": f"{LOCATION}-dialogflow.googleapis.com"}
)
import uuid
session_id = str(uuid.uuid4())
session_path = session_client.session_path(
project=PROJECT_ID,
location=LOCATION,
agent=agent_id,
session=session_id
)
def detect_intent(text: str, language_code: str = "en") -> dict:
text_input = dialogflow.TextInput(text=text)
query_input = dialogflow.QueryInput(
text=text_input,
language_code=language_code
)
request = dialogflow.DetectIntentRequest(
session=session_path,
query_input=query_input,
)
response = session_client.detect_intent(request=request)
query_result = response.query_result
return {
"response_text": " ".join([
msg.text.text[0]
for msg in query_result.response_messages
if msg.HasField("text")
]),
"intent": query_result.intent.display_name,
"confidence": query_result.intent_detection_confidence,
"parameters": dict(query_result.parameters),
"session_id": session_id,
}
return detect_intent
# Usage — multi-turn conversation
agent = create_agent_session_handler(AGENT_ID)
turn1 = agent("I haven't received my order number 98765")
print(f"Bot: {turn1['response_text']}")
print(f"Intent: {turn1['intent']} ({turn1['confidence']:.0%})")
turn2 = agent("It was supposed to arrive yesterday")
print(f"Bot: {turn2['response_text']}")
Streaming and Multi-turn Chat
from vertexai.generative_models import GenerativeModel, ChatSession
# Multi-turn chat with automatic history
model = GenerativeModel("gemini-2.0-flash-001")
chat: ChatSession = model.start_chat(history=[])
# Turn 1
response1 = chat.send_message("What is Vertex AI?")
print(f"Turn 1: {response1.text[:200]}...")
# Turn 2 — Turn 1 context included automatically
response2 = chat.send_message("What are its main services?")
print(f"Turn 2: {response2.text[:200]}...")
# Turn 3 — implicit reference thanks to context
response3 = chat.send_message("Which one is best suited for RAG?")
print(f"Turn 3: {response3.text[:200]}...")
# Streaming the response (real-time UX)
print("\nStreaming response:")
for chunk in model.generate_content(
"Explain machine learning in simple terms.",
stream=True
):
print(chunk.text, end="", flush=True)
print()
Gemini Model Comparison
Gemini 2.0 Family — Comparison Table
| Criterion | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Ultra | Gemini Nano |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use case | High volume, low latency | General enterprise use | Ultra-complex tasks | On-device, mobile |
| Intelligence | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Speed | ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ | ⚡⚡⚡ | ⚡⚡ | ⚡⚡⚡⚡ |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 2M tokens | 2M tokens | 32K tokens |
| Multimodal | Text, image, audio, video | Text, image, audio, video | Text, image, audio, video | Text, image |
| Relative price | Low | Moderate | Premium | Very low |
| Reasoning | Good | Excellent | Exceptional | Basic |
| Code | Good | Very good | Exceptional | Limited |
| Deployment | Cloud + Edge | Cloud | Cloud only | On-device |
| Function Calling | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ limited |
| Grounding | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
When to Choose Which Model?
graph TD
Start["Which Gemini model to use?"]
Start --> Q1{"On-device\nor mobile deployment?"}
Q1 -->|Yes| Nano["Gemini Nano\n(Pixel, Android)"]
Q1 -->|No| Q2{"Very high volume\nor critical latency?"}
Q2 -->|Yes| Flash["Gemini 2.0 Flash\n- High-volume chatbots\n- Batch summarization\n- Classification"]
Q2 -->|No| Q3{"Ultra-complex task?\n(research, deep analysis,\nmulti-step reasoning)"}
Q3 -->|Yes| Ultra["Gemini 2.0 Ultra\n- Scientific analysis\n- Complex code\n- Advanced reasoning"]
Q3 -->|No| Pro["Gemini 2.0 Pro\n- General enterprise use\n- RAG pipelines\n- Conversational agents"]
Specialized Google Cloud Models
| Model | Specialty | Primary Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Imagen 3 | Image generation | Marketing, design, visual content |
| Codey (code-bison) | Code generation | IDE assistance, automated code review |
| Chirp 2 | Speech-to-text | Transcription, subtitling, voice bots |
| text-embedding-004 | Semantic embeddings | RAG, semantic search, clustering |
| MedPaLM 2 | Medical AI | Medical Q&A, clinical summarization |
| Sec-PaLM | Cybersecurity | Threat analysis, AI SIEM |
| Gemma 2 | Lightweight open-source | Custom fine-tuning, edge deployment |
Google Cloud AI vs AWS AI vs Azure AI
Main Platforms
| Criterion | Google Cloud (Vertex AI) | AWS (SageMaker + Bedrock) | Azure (Azure AI + OpenAI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML Platform | Vertex AI | Amazon SageMaker | Azure Machine Learning |
| Managed GenAI service | Vertex AI (Gemini) | Amazon Bedrock | Azure OpenAI Service |
| Flagship model | Gemini 2.0 Pro/Ultra | Claude 3.5 (Anthropic) + Titan | GPT-4o (OpenAI) |
| Model catalog | Model Garden (100+ models) | Bedrock (30+ models) | Azure AI Model Catalog (100+ models) |
| Open source support | Llama, Mistral, Gemma | Llama, Mistral | Llama, Mistral, Phi |
| AutoML | Vertex AI AutoML | SageMaker Autopilot | Azure AutoML |
| RAG infrastructure | Vertex AI Search + Vector Search | Knowledge Bases (Bedrock) | Azure AI Search |
| Agent framework | Vertex AI Agent Builder | Bedrock Agents | Azure AI Agent Service |
| Voice/Speech | Chirp 2 | Amazon Transcribe | Azure Speech |
| Image generation | Imagen 3 | Amazon Titan Image | DALL-E 3 (Azure OpenAI) |
| Workplace integration | Google Workspace (native) | — | Microsoft 365 Copilot (native) |
| Custom TPU | TPU v4/v5 (Google exclusive) | ❌ (Trainium, Inferentia) | ❌ (standard GPU) |
| Max context window | 2M tokens (Gemini 2.0) | 200K (Claude 3.5) | 128K (GPT-4o) |
| Pricing model | Pay-per-token | Pay-per-token | Pay-per-token |
| Native multimodal | Text, image, audio, video | Varies by model | GPT-4o |
Specialized CX Services
| Feature | Google Cloud | AWS | Azure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Center AI | CCAI (Dialogflow CX + Agent Assist) | Amazon Connect + Lex | Azure Communication Services + Bot Service |
| Virtual Agent | Dialogflow CX | Amazon Lex | Azure Bot Service |
| Agent Assist | Agent Assist (CCAI) | Amazon Connect Wisdom | Azure Contact Center (via Nuance) |
| Conversation Analytics | Conversational Insights | Contact Lens (Amazon Connect) | Azure Metrics Advisor |
| Enterprise Search | Vertex AI Search | Amazon Kendra | Azure Cognitive Search |
Google Cloud GenAI Pricing
Note: Prices are indicative. Check cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/pricing for current rates.
Gemini on Vertex AI — Per-token Rates
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Context > 128K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | ~$0.075 | ~$0.30 | +50% |
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | ~$1.25 | ~$5.00 | +50% |
| Gemini 1.5 Flash | ~$0.075 | ~$0.30 | +50% |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | ~$1.25 | ~$5.00 | +50% |
| text-embedding-004 | ~$0.025 | N/A | N/A |
Other GenAI Services
| Service | Pricing |
|---|---|
| Vertex AI Search | ~$2.50 / 1,000 queries |
| Imagen 3 | ~$0.04 / generated image (1024x1024) |
| Chirp 2 Speech-to-Text | ~$0.016 / minute of audio |
| Dialogflow CX | ~$0.007 / session (text), ~$0.06 / session (voice) |
| Agent Assist | ~$0.06 / assisted session |
| Vector Search | ~$0.10 / 1,000 queries + storage |
Cost Optimization Strategies
graph TD
OPT["GenAI Cost Optimization"]
OPT --> M1["Choose Flash for high-volume\nworkloads instead of Pro"]
OPT --> M2["Batch requests for\nnon-real-time processing"]
OPT --> M3["Cache responses\nfor recurring queries"]
OPT --> M4["Context window management\n(truncate long conversations)"]
OPT --> M5["Quotas and budgets\nvia Cloud Billing alerts"]
OPT --> M6["Committed Use Discounts\nfor predictable volumes"]
Architecture Diagrams
Complete Google Cloud GenAI Ecosystem Architecture
graph TD
subgraph "Users and Applications"
U1["Workspace Users\nGmail · Docs · Sheets · Meet"]
U2["Developers\nAPI · SDK · Vertex AI Studio"]
U3["End Customers\nApps · Contact Centers · Web"]
end
subgraph "Gemini Model Family"
G1["Gemini Ultra\nComplex tasks\nAdvanced reasoning"]
G2["Gemini Pro\nGeneral enterprise use"]
G3["Gemini Flash\nHigh volume · Low latency"]
G4["Gemini Nano\nOn-device · Mobile"]
end
subgraph "Vertex AI Platform"
MG["Model Garden\n100+ model catalog"]
VAS["Vertex AI Studio\nNo-code experimentation"]
VAB["Agent Builder\nAgent construction"]
PIPE["Managed Pipelines\nML orchestration"]
AML["AutoML\nNo-code training"]
VS["Vector Search\nManaged vector database"]
end
subgraph "Specialized AI Services"
VSearch["Vertex AI Search\nIntelligent enterprise search"]
Dialogflow["Dialogflow CX\nAdvanced conversational agents"]
AA["Agent Assist\nReal-time human agent support"]
CI["Conversational Insights\nPost-interaction analysis"]
NLM["NotebookLM\nCurated source analysis"]
Imagen["Imagen 3\nImage generation"]
Chirp["Chirp 2\nSpeech-to-Text"]
end
subgraph "Optimized Infrastructure"
TPU["TPU v4/v5\nGoogle custom accelerators"]
GPU["High-perf GPUs\nA100, H100"]
DC["Global Data Centers\n35+ regions"]
SEC["Security Layer\nIAM · Encryption · DLP · CMEK"]
end
U1 & U2 & U3 --> G1 & G2 & G3 & G4
G1 & G2 & G3 --> MG & VAS & VAB
VAB --> VSearch & Dialogflow & AA
Dialogflow --> CI
MG & AML & PIPE --> VS
VS --> TPU & GPU
TPU & GPU --> DC
SEC --> DC
Key Concepts and Terminology
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Gemini | Google’s multimodal foundation model (text, image, audio, video, code) — the reasoning engine integrated throughout the entire Google stack |
| Vertex AI | Google Cloud’s managed ML platform covering the complete ML lifecycle, from data preparation to deployment |
| Model Garden | Centralized catalog of 100+ AI models in Vertex AI: Google, open-source (Llama, Mistral, Gemma), third-party (Claude, Cohere) |
| AutoML | Vertex AI capability for training custom models (tabular, image, text, video) without deep ML expertise |
| RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) | Technique anchoring LLM responses in verified document sources via vectorization + semantic search |
| Vertex AI Vector Search | Managed vector database service (ANN search) for RAG pipelines and semantic search |
| Gems | Customizable versions of Gemini with persistent instructions and personas for specific roles |
| NotebookLM | AI workspace anchored in user-curated sources (up to 50 sources / 25M tokens) with inline citations |
| Agent Assist | CCAI service providing real-time suggestions, document snippets, and summaries to human agents during active calls |
| Dialogflow CX | Enterprise platform for building advanced conversational agents with visual flow management and multi-turn context |
| Conversational Insights | Post-interaction analysis service for 100% of conversations — sentiment, topics, trends, operational KPIs |
| Vertex AI Search | AI-powered enterprise search service: NLU, multimodal, synthesized responses anchored in approved corpus |
| TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) | Google custom hardware accelerator optimized for ML/AI workloads — superior to general-purpose GPUs for LLMs |
| Vertex AI Agent Builder | No-code/low-code environment for building AI agents (search, conversational, reasoning) on Google Cloud |
| Transformer Architecture | Fundamental deep learning architecture for LLMs (“Attention Is All You Need” paper, 2017, Google Brain) |
| Foundation Model | Large model pre-trained on massive, heterogeneous data, adaptable to multiple use cases via prompting or fine-tuning |
| Grounding | Process of anchoring AI responses in verified data sources to reduce hallucinations |
| IAM (Identity and Access Management) | System for managing identities and granular permissions on Google Cloud |
| DLP (Data Loss Prevention) | Automatic policies preventing the leakage of sensitive data (PII, PHI, PCI) |
| CMEK (Customer-Managed Encryption Keys) | Customer-managed encryption keys for full control of data at rest |
| Multimodal | Capability to process and generate multiple media types in a single request (text, image, audio, video, code) |
| Context Window | Maximum number of tokens a model can process in a single request (Gemini 2.0: up to 2M tokens) |
| Function Calling | Model capability to call external APIs and functions in a structured way for agents |
| Embedding | Dense vector representation of text capturing its semantic meaning, used for search and RAG |
| Imagen 3 | Google Cloud’s text-to-image generation model available in Vertex AI |
| Chirp 2 | Google’s speech recognition (ASR) model — supports 100+ languages with high accuracy |
| Vertex AI Studio | No-code web interface for experimenting with Gemini models, adjusting prompts, and exporting to code |
| Hypercomputer | Google’s orchestration layer that connects and coordinates thousands of compute resources for distributed training |
Search Terms
google · cloud · genai · offerings · ai · foundations · artificial · intelligence · generative · gemini · vertex · agent · agents · model · question · search · services · ai-powered · architecture · capabilities · center · comparison · contact · customer